Students want to be heard on the social and political issues, including issues of local school policy, directly affecting their lives. Their unique perspective is important for adult policymakers to hear and respect. With the erosion of mainstream news media coverage, “embedded” student journalists are often the public’s only way knowing when schools are dirty, dangerous or ineffective. Too often, authority figures bent on P.R. image control suppress candid journalism that “makes the school look bad.”
Students learn journalism best under a light touch of guidance from a well-trained adviser, not the heavy hand of government “spin control.” Every K-12 student should have the benefit of a sensible free-expression policy modeled on the Supreme Court’s Tinker standard, protecting the right to engage in lawful, non-disruptive speech. Educators must be protected against retaliation for what their students say or write, and schools’ authority over off-campus online speech must be strictly limited to prevent censorship from following students home.
Read former SPLC Executive Director Frank LoMonte's 2013 commentary piece for Education Week on the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier and the damage it has done to students' First Amendment rights.
“Censorship is the fundamental cause of the triviality, innocuousness and uniformity that characterize the high school press. Where a free, vigorous student press does exist, there is a healthy ferment of ideas and opinions with no indication of disruption or negative side effects on the educational experience of the school.”
— Jack Nelson
Captive Voices (1974)