SPLC - Student Press Law Center
SPLC Home Resource Center News Flashes About SPLC SPLC Report SPLC Members SPLC Store
News Flash

NEWS FLASH ARCHIVES
  Current News Flashes
  2010 News Flashes
  2009 News Flashes
  2008 News Flashes
  2007 News Flashes
  2006 News Flashes
  2005 News Flashes
SEARCH ARTICLES
Advanced Search



Join SPLC E-Mail List




Email This Page Print This Page

FOI request to investigate government spying, ACLU says

Student anti-war groups tagged by government tracking database


© 2006 Student Press Law Center

February 6, 2006

CALIFORNIA — When California students protested military recruiters last year, they never expected to end up on a terrorist watch list. Now they want to know why.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California filed a Freedom of Information Act request last week on behalf of two student groups from California universities asking for all records and information kept on the groups by several government agencies, including the Department of Defense.

The request, filed by ACLU attorney Mark Schlosberg on Feb. 1, is an expedited request. The government agencies must decide whether or not they will process the request as expedited and notify Schlosberg with their decision within 10 days.

Department of Defense spokesman Cmdr. Greg Hicks said he did not know if the appropriate government office had received the FOI request. He said information requests are handled in accordance with U.S. government regulations.

“There are specific avenues for FOIA requests that come into the department,” Hicks said. “Each is handled with its own merits and routinely in succession of receipt.”

The two student groups represented by the ACLU are the University of California at Santa Cruz’s Students Against War and the Stop the War Coalition at the University of California at Berkeley.

The FOI request is connected to rallies organized last April by the student groups that protested military recruitment on their campuses. The students approached the ACLU after NBC News reported that in the wake of those rallies, the events and participants showed up on a Department of Defense database as potentially threatening.

The database, Threat and Local Observation Notice, or TALON, was initiated in 2003 by former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz to monitor groups and individuals with potential links to terrorism.

“Our major complaint is that they were participating in protected First Amendment activities,” said Stella Richardson, spokeswoman for the ACLU. “As students, they have a right to do so under the Constitution. That the Pentagon would have the events listed on a Pentagon database as potential threats is alarming.”

Richardson said the FOI request seeks to find out why the protests were listed on the database, what are the criteria for inclusion on the database and why the protests and protesters were perceived as a threat.

Schlosberg, the ACLU attorney, said that if the government is systematically monitoring college campuses for anti-war activities, those records have “very distributing implications for privacy, academic freedom and political expression on university campuses.”

Kot Hordynski, 20, was quoted in an Associated Press article as saying, “We were expressing our patriotic rights ... engaging in civil disobedience. We want to show it’s not OK for the Department of Defense or the Pentagon to spy on its citizens.” Hordynski is a member of Students Against War and attended an April 5 rally against military recruiters.

Other government agencies listed on the request include the Directorate for Freedom of Information, the departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force and the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Cmdr. Terry Sutherland, spokesman for the Defense Intelligence Agency, said he is “not aware of any kind of request” from the ACLU of Northern California.

Sutherland said the DIA has a huge backlog of information requests that often take months or years to respond to, even if the request is expedited.

“We have to take this document, redact everything and go through its review process,” he said. “It’s not as quick as people would like to think it is. It’s very manpower intensive.”

Richardson, the ACLU spokeswoman, said it is “never easy” for the ACLU to get information from the government, and that information requests like this one often lead to litigation.

—by Allison Retka, SPLC staff writer

Share


For More Information:

< Return to Previous Page


Search | Contact the SPLC | Resource Center | News Flashes | About SPLC | SPLC Report | Members | SPLC Store | Site Map | Home