Fall 2007 - Cover Story
Vol. XXVIII, No. 3 - Page 25
Early legal applications of the Morse decision
© 2007 Student Press Law Center
As soon as the Morse v. Frederick decision was handed down from the
U.S. Supreme Court in late June, it immediately began appearing in lower
courts’ opinions across the country.
On July 2, just seven days
after the "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" ruling, a California superior court cited the new
precedent in overturning a middle school’s dress code, which banned all
pictures, logos, words, stripes and patterns, and had disciplined students for
wearing an American Cancer Society ribbon pin and T-shirts reading "Jesus Freak"
and "D.A.R.E. to keep kids off drugs."
The judge invoked Morse as
a reaffirmation of the Tinker standard.
"It has long been held
that, under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States,
student expression is protected, so long as it does not ‘materially and
substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school,’" Judge
Raymond Guadagni wrote in his decision in Scott v. Napa Valley Unified School
District. "This well settled principle has just been reconfirmed by the
Supreme Court in Morse v. Frederick."
On July 10, Judge Terrence
McVerry of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
ruled that a student’s suspension for creating a satirical MySpace profile
of his principal was unconstitutional, citing Justice Samuel Alito’s
concurring opinion in Morse to reject the school district’s claim
that the parody profile undermined the school’s educational mission.
"Justice Alito’s concurrence in Morse clarifies that
Morse does not permit school officials unfettered latitude to censor
student speech under the rubric of ‘interference with the educational
mission’ because that term can be easily manipulated," McVerry ruled in
Layshock v. Hermitage School District.
But a third student
free-speech case decided since "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" went in the opposite
direction.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’ July 5 decision
upholding an eighth-grader’s suspension for sharing an AOL Instant
Messenger buddy icon depicting his teacher being shot was influenced by Morse
v. Frederick, said the student’s attorney, Stephen Ciotoli.
"I
assume the 2nd Circuit was waiting for that decision and, to a certain extent, I
think they followed it," he said of the ruling in his case, Wisniewski v.
Board of Education of the Weedsport Central School District. "They
probably figured if they had gone the other way and then this case had gone up
to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court might have reversed
them."
< Return to Previous Page