WASHINGTON, D.C.
— Earlier this year, federal appeals courts decided three key cases focusing on
online student expression rights. Now, lawyers in two of those cases will ask
the nation’s highest court to weigh in. Less than two weeks after the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals found 8-6 in favor of a middle school student who mocked her principal
on MySpace, the school district announced its intention to appeal to the
Supreme Court. The district authorized its legal counsel to petition the Court
to grant certiorari, or “cert” for short. "We feel we have to pursue [an appeal] because we feel
we have an obligation to protect our faculty and staff from the misuse of
social media and other things," said Carl Yeich, board president of the
Blue Mountain School District, at a school board meeting covered by the Republican-Herald newspaper. “J.S.” was a student at Blue Mountain Middle School in
Pennsylvania in 2007 when she was suspended for 10 days after creating a
MySpace profile mocking the school principal, James McGonigle. Her parents sued
the school district on her behalf for violating her First Amendment rights and
their due process rights to discipline their child as they wished. Both the district court and a three-judge panel of the Third
Circuit found in favor of the school district. However, when the full Third
Circuit court reheard the case along with an extremely similar one, Layshock v. Hermitage School District,
it found in favor of the students in both cases. “It’s their prerogative [to appeal the case],” said Witold
“Vic” Walczak, legal director of ACLU Pennsylvania. “We don’t believe that this
is a cert-worthy case, but obviously the Supreme Court will make up its own
mind.” Lawyers for Hermitage School District did not return calls
asking whether they would file for an appeal. The district has until Sept. 12
to ask the Supreme Court to grant them an appeal. On April 25, a panel of judges from the 2nd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals concluded that Connecticut student Avery Doninger’s First
Amendment rights were not violated when she was prevented from running for
class office, and later prevented from accepting the office she was elected to
by write-in ballot, after calling school administrators “douchebags” on her
blog in 2007. The Second Circuit determined that the district had been
“objectively reasonable” in their decision to punish her for her blog post. It
granted the district immunity from the lawsuit but did not address whether
Doninger’s rights were violated. Doninger attorney John Schoenhorn
wrote in an email that he intends to ask the Supreme Court to hear an appeal in
this case as well because the conflict between the Second Circuit and Third
Circuit’s decisions could create confusion. Doninger must file for appeal with
the Supreme Court by July 25, and Blue Mountain School District must file by
Sept. 12. The Supreme Court will then decide if it will hear either of the
cases. They would be the first rulings from the high court on students’ right
to free speech on the Internet. By Emily T. Gerston, SPLC staff writer
© 2011 Student Press Law Center