OREGON — After a year beset with conflict — ranging from an online security breach to the ousting of an adviser to
allegations of First Amendment violations — members of the journalism
community at Western Oregon University are ready for a fresh start.
And College Media Advisers is ready to help.
The CMA issued a
letter of concern last week for the health of student
media at Western Oregon University and offered to work with administrators to
create a better environment for student journalists.
The organization investigated Western Oregon University's
relationship with student media following Susan Wickstrom's removal as the
student newspaper's adviser. Wickstrom became entangled in controversy
when members of the paper's staff discovered and reported about unsecured,
sensitive student information on the school's Web site.
The CMA concluded that university officials' handling of the security
investigation last summer indicated a lack of understanding of the basic
philosophy and principles that guide student media advisers and a lack of
knowledge about journalism ethics. University computer technicians searched the
Journal newsroom after hours to search for copies of the data, and
officials determined the staffer involved in discovering the security breach
violated computer policies. One policy prohibits "accessing clearly
confidential files that may be inadvertently publicly readable."
The CMA said the after-hours search compromised the newspaper's
credibility because journalists cannot perform their public service function if
subjected to searches by the people they are covering. It added that the
resulting punishments seemed to blame staffers for informing the community about
the breach.
"We're very interested in working with WOU in helping them to
establish an environment that is healthier for student media," said Ken
Rosenauer, president of CMA. "And some of what's involved with that
are opportunities for helping educate administrators about appropriate student
media operations and relations."
A secretary for the university's president, John Minahan, said he had
no comment.
Because Wickstrom does not want her position back, CMA will focus on
working with school officials to develop better policies regarding their
engagements with student journalists, Rosenauer said. Since CMA developed its
adviser advocacy program in 1998, it has censured seven schools for wrongly
removing advisers and issued statements of concern for four institutions,
including last week's letter to Western Oregon University.
"We want to extend an offer to the university president and the
community that will hopefully ensure that when next they have some kind of issue
involving student media, they handle it differently, more appropriately,"
he said.
First clash
Trouble began a year ago when student Blair Loving, newly hired to serve as
a copy editor, inadvertently discovered a College of Education file containing
student Social Security numbers and other sensitive data on a public university
server. He downloaded the file and took it to the Journal's
editor-elect Gerry Blakney. Blakney gave Wickstrom a copy of the data to
temporarily store in her desk so that it could be used as a reference for future
articles about the breach.
"What Susan Wickstrom did in many respects was she protected that
information and protected that sensitive data," Rosenauer said.
"Without clear guidelines to the contrary, indicating she should have done
this or done that, she seemed to follow a common sense approach."
University officials said they dismissed Wickstrom because she mishandled
confidential information by failing to immediately turn over all copies of the
data.
But the local Society of Professional Journalists chapter praised her
conduct. The organization honored Wickstrom last month with the First Freedom
Award, which is given to those who demonstrate exemplary service to the First
Amendment.
The society "felt strongly that for her courage and her integrity,
Susan Wickstrom should be honored," Nick Budnick said in an e-mail to the
Student Press Law Center. Budnick serves as the Sunshine Chair for the Society
of Professional Journalists' Oregon and Southwest Washington chapter and
gave the speech delivering her honor. "It seemed to us that she worked to
foster and protect the practice of watchdog journalism — and paid a price
for it," Budnick wrote.
Wickstrom said the award was bittersweet gratification.
"It validated my compassion for the First Amendment and it made me
realize that all the journalism community, in Oregon at least, believes that
student presses should be independent, especially at a public campus," she
said. "For it to end the way it did was deeply disappointing for me,
because I learned so much there and I will always have the students in my
heart."
Tensions rise
After Wickstrom left her post, an interim adviser took over. The copy
editor was nearly expelled, and problems continued for Journal staffers
— beginning with a disagreement between them and administrators over a
phrase below the newspaper's nameplate, reading "Student
Owned and Operated, Reporting the Unabashed Truth." The vice president for
student affairs objected and asked the adviser to change the phrase, arguing the
Oregon State Board of Higher Education actually owns the newspaper. But staffers
did not comply, and administrators dropped the issue.
In November, when the school conducted a "Fall Preview Day" for
about 400 prospective students and their families, conflict again ensued.
Associate Provost David McDonald said he turned copies of the paper
upside-down or mixed them in with other materials to prevent younger siblings of
prospective students from seeing that week's front-page article, which
featured a frontal, nude photo of the men's rugby team with their genitals
obscured. But Blakney said McDonald removed Journal copies from
distribution bins altogether. McDonald later apologized in a published letter to
the editor, saying he failed to follow university policy in the matter.
High tensions between administrators and Journal staffers escalated
when Blakney learned the interim adviser and other school officials were
discussing changes to the student media bylaws without input from students or
the Student Media Board. He issued a public plea for help.
"I am writing to you out of desperation," he said in a
thousand-word, campuswide e-mail sent in January. "Our First Amendment
guarantee of a free press is coming to an end."
Blakney went on to detail the Journal's confrontations with
school officials over the school year, saying the administration had
"completely taken control of the student press" by undermining the
students' free-press rights.
University President Minahan followed with another campuswide e-mail,
announcing he had appointed an ad-hoc committee to investigate Blakney's
allegations.
"As I see it, no university can afford to be confused about
fundamental issues of what is true and what is false when it comes to a
fundamental right like free speech," Minahan wrote.
Allegations challenged
The Ad-hoc Committee on Free Press — consisting of three faculty
members and a local professional journalist — issued its
report on
Blakney's four main allegations in April, concluding, "the
accusations of First Amendment violations were made recklessly."
The security breach investigation was badly handled, but not illegal, the
committee wrote. The committee additionally said the administrator who requested
the nameplate change was legally justified in doing so; the committee also found
administrators made no official changes to the Student Media Board bylaws,
though they acted inappropriately by taking it upon themselves to develop
improvements for what they deemed to be an ineffective Student Media
Board.
"This was not a case of knights running to the rescue of the First
Amendment, which is was we expected. But it wasn't," said Dick
Hughes, the editorial page editor of The Statesman Journal who served on
the committee. "I just expected that I'd be riding up to the fiery
columns to stand up for the First Amendment and the students, writing editorials
and the like, and that just wasn't the case."
The seven-page report largely concluded that administrators responded
ineptly and heavy-handedly in multiple situations over the year, which
illustrated the dysfunctional relationship between the newspaper and the
administration with a poorly operating Student Media Board. The committee found
the allegations of free-speech and free-press violations "unfounded"
— and Blair Loving, the copy editor involved in the first security breach
incident, agreed.
He said like much of the Journal staff, he resigned before the end
of the school year.
"A lot of people just got tired of it and didn't want to be
involved in this little war Gerry [Blakney] was having with the
administrators," Loving said, noting he felt as if Blakney was using the
paper to anger those who had angered him.
Blakney did not return several voicemail and e-mail messages requesting
comment over the past two weeks.
Loving issued his own campuswide e-mail in response to Blakney's
initial plea, but his began: "I am writing you in clarification."
Loving then contradicted much of his co-worker's allegations, saying
his understanding was that Wickstrom did not have her contract renewed because
she was believed to have "misled" administrators during the security
breach investigation. He also contested each of Blakney's allegations and
expressed concern about the lack of oversight for the Journal.
Wickstrom, though declining to comment specifically in response to
Loving's e-mail, said she believed she was protecting students'
rights to gather information throughout the ordeal.
Adam Goldstein, attorney advocate for the Student Press Law Center, said
any time students feel a chilling effect on free speech, there is a First
Amendment violation.
"It's difficult to see how students can be reckless in claiming
that they don't feel safe exercising free speech," Goldstein said.
"It really doesn't matter whether they don't feel safe because
of malicious intent of a pattern of blunders by administrators. A school
can't deflect a claim of a First Amendment violation by pointing out they
were only incompetent, rather than evil."
Like the College of Media Advisers, Wickstrom and Loving both said they are
concerned about the state of student media at Western Oregon University but are
trying to move on.
Said Loving, "I'm just really ready to put this all behind
me."
By Kelsey Beltramea, SPLC staff writer