MISSOURI — A high school sophomore who was suspended for
taking photos of his teacher during class and posting the pictures online lost
the first round of his
lawsuit against the school district Dec. 11, when a
federal judge refused to lift the student's suspension early.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the student, Logan Glover, and his
father, Jerome. The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in St. Louis, argues that
Glover broke no school policy and caused no disruption by taking the
photos and
posting them on Facebook, and thus that Lafayette High School administrators and
the Rockwood School District violated Glover's First Amendment rights by
punishing him for his protected expression. Glover was suspended for three days
and permanently removed from his Language Arts class.
Glover took the photos with his digital camera Nov. 20, during his Language
Arts class. The pictures show teacher Jessica Hauser at her desk, looking over
paperwork and talking with other students. Hauser did not notice the pictures
being taken, but in some of the seven pictures, students smile or give a
thumbs-up to the camera. Later, Glover used his home computer to post the
pictures to his Facebook profile.
"This is sort of like, 'hey this is my life' pictures," Jerome Glover said,
noting that "there is nothing about the pictures that anyone should find
offensive." Logan Glover was not available to comment; he was in school Friday
and scheduled to leave on vacation with his family immediately after school,
Jerome Glover said.
On Dec. 6, more than two weeks after Logan Glover took the photos, school
officials learned about the pictures and ordered Glover to provide them with
copies. Glover did so and removed the photos from Facebook. On Dec. 7, Glover
and his parents met with Assistant Principal Kirti Mehrotra, who gave Glover a
letter notifying him that he was suspended for three days, beginning Dec. 10.
The letter listed Glover's offense as "disruption of school environment."
But Mark Sableman, the Glovers' attorney, said students were working
independently when Glover took his pictures, and thus the photos did not disrupt
any class lectures or discussions. Sableman noted that Hauser and school
officials did not even learn the pictures existed until weeks after they were
posted.
"There was no disruption of the class period at all, much less any
substantial disruption," Sableman said.
The Glovers also maintain that, since few people even noticed the pictures
being taken, Logan Glover is really being punished for posting the pictures
online from home. The lawsuit contends that administrators had no right to
regulate expression that took place outside of school and used no school
resources.
Kim Cranston, the district's communications director, said the district
would not comment on the case to the media on the advice of the district's and
the plaintiffs' lawyers. But in
court filings, the school district argues that
the pictures disrupted the classroom because some students posed for the camera
and were "off-task and joking around rather than paying attention." In an
affidavit, Principal John Shaughnessy says there was "considerable discussion of
the photographs" in several classes once the photos were discovered, resulting
in a "loss of classroom instruction time."
The district also notes that the school discipline policy prohibits
students from using their cell phones as cameras during the school day. But the
policy does not include a blanket prohibition on the use of standalone cameras.
The current version of Rockwood's student handbook only mentions restrictions on
student photography under the heading of "Sexual Misconduct"; that policy bars
students from taking photos in changing areas or in situation where people have
a reasonable expectation of privacy.
"There are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of pictures that we have
found on Facebook" of students and teachers in Lafayette classrooms, Jerome
Glover said. "The idea that cameras are somehow banned ... is literally
preposterous."
When the Glovers filed suit, they unsuccessfully asked for a temporary
restraining order that would have allowed Logan Glover to return to school a day
early and return to Hauser's class. Glover, who receives special education
services, was assigned to Hauser's class because a special education teacher is
assigned to work with that class. The Glovers contend that permanently removing
Logan Glover from the class violates his right to receive an adequate
education.
In justifying Glover's permanent removal from Hauser's class, Shaughnessy
said in his affidavit that Hauser was "deeply troubled" by the photos and
subsequently had trouble focusing in class.
"She is very upset and worried over the photographs and believes her trust
has been violated," Shaughnessy said.
For now, Glover has been assigned to a ninth-grade Language Arts class.
Although that class also has a special education teacher, Glover's father said
the arrangement is unworkable because "the class content is the class content
that he had last year" and coordination with the tenth-grade class has been
cumbersome.
Sableman, the Glovers' attorney, said the family might be able to reach a
settlement with the district in the next week, while students are on break. But
Jerome Glover on Friday said he did not think that was likely.
"I'm not optimistic," Glover said.
By Michael Beder, SPLC staff writer