The
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's
ruling in March, saying that Juneau city officials could not censor independent student
expression, even if they believed it contradicted the school's anti-drug
policies, unless they could show that it would cause a disruption of classroom
activities.
Starr, now dean of the Pepperdine University School of Law in
Malibu, Calif., and an attorney at the Los Angeles law firm Kirkland and Ellis,
is working pro-bono for the school district, calling the 9th
Circuit's ruling "wildly wrong."
The case centers
around Joseph Frederick, a senior at Juneau-Douglas High School, who tried to
attract TV cameras by holding up a banner that said "Bong Hits 4
Jesus" as the Winter Olympic torch relay passed the school in 2002. School
officials had released students from school to watch the relay. School Principal
Deborah Morse grabbed the banner from Frederick and suspended him.
Morse
argued that "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" referred to using the drug
marijuana, and advocated illegal drug use.
Frederick had missed school
that day and was across the street, off of school property. Frederick said that
when he quoted Thomas Jefferson to Morse, she increased his suspension from 5
days to 10 days.
The 9th Circuit's three-judge panel
determined that under provisions of the Supreme Court's 1969 student
expression ruling Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School
District, Frederick's constitutional rights were "plainly"
violated when school officials censored his sign.
"Under Tinker, a
school cannot censor or punish students speech merely because the students
advocate a position contrary to government policy," wrote Judge Andrew J.
Kleinfeld for the unanimous panel.
Kleinfeld also wrote that the phrase
"Bong Hits 4 Jesus" might be "funny, stupid, or insulting,
depending on one's point of view," but it was clearly a protected
form of student speech.
Frederick's lawyer, Douglas Mertz, said he
is confident the appeals court's ruling will be upheld, calling the school
district's appeal "foolish."
"For decades the
Supreme Court has recognized that students have free speech rights except under
certain circumstances. None of the circumstances exist in this case,"
Mertz said. "The school board was trying to use this to eliminate a
long-standing civil liberty enjoyed by students."
The petition will
need four of the nine justice's votes to be heard before the U.S. Supreme
Court.
by Scott Sternberg, SPLC staff writer
© 2006 Student Press Law Center
Share
For More Information: Frederick v. Morse, 439 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2006), petition for cert. filed, No. 06-278 (U.S. Aug. 27, 2006).
Read the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision