Some college student journalists might not know it, but at
their fingertips lay access to information about lawsuits, donations, salaries,
terrorist watch lists and more. “Most student journalists
probably do not understand the value of open records law but many working
journalists don’t either,” said Diana Huffman, a media law professor
at the University of Maryland. “Reporters tend to think the only way to
get a story is to interview someone or get someone to leak information to
them.” Huffman said that getting into the habit of filing open
records requests regularly is a good idea. “Set a goal of
filing [a freedom of information] request every month,” Huffman said.
“Students can use [such a request] not just for a particular story but
also as a source of story ideas. Sometimes the information you receive leads you
to uncover a story you had never considered.” To help college
student journalists come up with story ideas, the Student Press Law Center has
compiled some examples from recent years where journalists used open records at
the college level to dig deeper. Each of these cases was based on the
individual state open records law; so the conclusion might not be the same in
every state and would probably only apply to public schools. But these cases may
give college journalists ideas of the kinds of records they could be seeking to
better cover their school. Not just
the salary, but also the perks Using open records requests,
journalists were able to follow the money trail and force the University of
Maryland to release employment contract information for its coaches. In 2002 a sports reporter for
The Baltimore Sun requested the
employment contract information of head football coach Ralph Friedgen under the
Maryland Public Information Act. The paper also requested “any separate
letters of understanding, side letters or similar documents specifying
incentives, bonuses, broadcast agreements, athletic footwear contracts and other
matters concerning the terms and conditions of [Coach Friedgen’s]
employment and
compensation.” The Sun made a similar request for the contract information of Gary Williams, head coach
of the men’s basketball team. The university denied both
requests, citing exemptions in state open-records law protecting personnel
records and some financial information from disclosure. The Sun then filed suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. On April 15, 2004, the Court of Appeals of Maryland ruled that the university must make all the details of its employment contracts
public. The Sun’s
initiative to request more than just the salary figures is a good example for
student journalists to follow, said Student Press Law Center Legal Fellow Adam
Goldstein. Non-salaried compensation that student journalists should
look for include housing, flying first class on flights, free automobiles and
other expenses billed to the university, Goldstein
said. Incident report sees light of
day After two years and a lengthy court battle,
The Daily O’Collegian, the student
newspaper at Oklahoma State University in Stillwater, obtained an incident
report on a recent graduate who is now an NFL running back. The
school had refused to release records relating to a 2003 incident involving
former college football star Vernand Morency. Morency, who now plays for the
Houston Texans, was accused of rape, but school investigators could not
substantiate the claim. A court ordered the school to release the
records in January 2005. Morency appealed, but filed a motion to dismiss on Aug.
29, thereby releasing the documents to the newspaper. The paper ran a story on
the records Aug. 31. "It was a victory for collegiate journalism and
something I’m proud of being a part of, if only on the fringes," said
former Daily O’Collegian Editor
in Chief Jared Janes. Spotlight on
parking tickets In December 1998, Maryland's high court ruled
that information about unpaid parking tickets charged to student athletes and
coaches as well as NCAA records of related violations must be open to the
public. The Maryland Court of Appeals ruling came two years after The Diamondback, the student newspaper
at the University of Maryland's College Park campus, filed suit against the
university under the state open records law. The University had
refused The Diamondback access to the
records about the student athletes, arguing the records were exempt from the
state open records law because they were "education records" covered by the
Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), commonly known as the Buckley
Amendment. But the Maryland Court of Appeals ruled otherwise, saying
that the education records covered by FERPA did not include records of parking
tickets or NCAA violations. "The legislative history of [FERPA]
indicates that the statute was not intended to preclude the release of any
record simply because the record contained the name of a student," the court's
opinion in Kirwan v. The Diamondback
said. "Congress intended to prevent educational institutions from operating in
secrecy. "We hold that 'education records' within the meaning of
[FERPA] do not include records of parking tickets or correspondence between the
NCAA and the University regarding a student athlete accepting a loan to pay
parking tickets.” Keeping the
door open on student government meetings Last November the
Court of Appeals of New York ruled that decision-making bodies at public
colleges are required to abide by the state’s freedom of information laws.
The ruling came after the College Senate at Hostos Community
College, a school in the City University of New York system, denied two students
access to public meetings in 2001. One student wanted to attend a meeting where
the senate voted by secret ballot to change the curriculum. The court ruled that
the Senate was wrong in denying access and also, as a decision-making body, was
not allowed to vote by secret ballot. The other student wanted to present a
student petition regarding a student protest. Most public agencies
are not obligated to release some information; for example, schools usually keep
students’ grades confidential, Goldstein said. But problems arise as to
what exactly is exempted legally from public disclosure and what is earmarked as
public information. “Who makes the call as to what needs to be
secret?” Goldstein said. “Sometimes administrators don’t know
where to draw the line. Making the wrong call isn’t so much a problem as
being willing to admit to making a mistake.”
--compiled by Ricky Ribeiro, SPLC staff writer